Review: Live Free or Die Hard
by Marcus on June 27, 2007
The Die Hard franchise has a special place in my heart, I saw the two first movies almost every time I was sick as a kid, and John McClane is probably my favorite movie hero. When I heard about a fourth movie I had the same feeling as when I heard about Terminator 3; I generally don't like it when sequels are created so many years after its predecessor, mainly because what we expect from movies, and how we look at them, changes, so a sequel released more than 10 years after the original rarely stands a chance when it's compared to the original movie(s). They should also just be able to stop when they're on top, there's no need to risk destroying a great franchise, and in some cases it just seems like they want to use a famous brand to earn some money. Anyway, naturally I had to watch the new Die Hard, and here's what I thought.
The plot is very simple: Thomas Gabriel (Timothy Olyphant) wants to literally close down the United States by taking down the computer and technological structure of the country. McClane is supposed to pick up a cracker, Matt Farrell (Justin Long), who's on Gabriel's hit list, because, well, he knows too much. Of course the assassination fails and McClane and Farrell team up to put a stop to Gabriel's evil plans.
Firefights and melee combat is a must in Die Hard movies and the fourth installation starts out fine with a cool fight in Farrell's apartment (the scene from the trailer with McClane shooting at a fire extinguisher, thus blowing some bad guys out the window), and ends with a nice little car scene. The next part of the movie centers around a city chase, where McClane and Farrell are being chased through New York by a helicopter, it ends with an incredible scene in a tunnel with traffic coming from both ends and ending with McClane ramming a police car through the tolls, making it fly into the helicopter, as seen in the trailer as well.
As far as I remember there's one more proper fight scene, but it's pretty short. After the city chase McClane and Farrell goes to a power plant, where they know Gabriel's henchmen are trying to shut down the electricity in the eastern part of the US. At the plant McClane confronts Gabriel's girlfriend, she kicks his ass a little, he rams her into some shelves and stuff, she kicks him off the platform they're on and he steals a big car and rams it into her pretty face. "Your girlfriend? She's on the bottom of an elevator shaft with a SUV rammed up her ass." – Now that's McClane talking, unfortunately this is one of the few cool punch lines in the movie. They continue on to a cool and very funny scene with Kevin Smith, one of my favorite directors.
The last action scene is ridiculous. McClane is inside a big truck, being chased by a fighter aircraft, that fires some rockets after him, hitting a highway pillar, making the second floor of the highway collapse behind McClane; it ends with a part of the upper highway falling down right in front of the truck, like a staircase, making it possible for McClane to drive up. For some reason the aircraft starts hovering meters away from McClane, and by sheer chance a rock falls into the aircraft's engine, making it crash, but not before McClane jumps onto it, and then jumps down on the road the last second before it explodes. The scene is just too extreme, not only is it ridiculously unrealistic, it doesn't fit into the Die Hard franchise very well, because, well, he's not even fighting the aircraft, he's just kinda trying to avoid it until it just so happens to crash. I would much rather have had a proper fight scene with Gabriel and his goons, but no, that part of the movie's ending is very anticlimactic and it's over in a few minutes. The movie is packed with CGI, and in some scenes it's fitting, but in most it's too much, especially this last scene and the one with McClane destroying the helicopter with a car. Sure, it's cool, but it's just too unrealistic.
So, we get to the ending, McClane has found Gabriel, who is holding McClane's daughter hostage, McClane is shot in the shoulder, which looks incredibly cool, and then Gabriel grabs him, while pointing his gun into McClane's wound (thus also pointing the gun at himself), McClane finally goes "Yippie-ka yay, motherf-BLAAM!", and fires Gabriel's gun through himself and into Gabriel's chest, killing him. And yes, you read it correctly; he doesn't actually say "motherfucker", the sound of the gun masks it, and I can't describe how much that annoys me! Who gives a shit about not getting a PG-13 rating, this is John McClane, the king of cool punch lines and he's not even allowed to fire off the best one. Common sentence from Die Hard 1: "Fuck… Oh, John, what the fuck are you doing? How the fuck did you get into this shit?" That's how John McClane talks, I didn't hear one 'fuck' from him in this one, and it really affects the coolness of the movie's punch lines. Other than the motherfucker-line, there's one more thing you must include if you're making a Die Hard movie: McClane has too look like crap in the end, he's not a great fighter, but he doesn't give a shit, he kicks ass anyway, and takes a lot of punches while doing it. That's what so cool about him. And, sure, he looks pretty banged up after he jumps out from the car in the beginning of the movie and he gets shot a couple of times in the end, but that's it, where's all the blood? Where are the limp and broken bones? The cuts? Somehow I feel the need to achieve a certain rating is to blame, again.
See that? That's John McClane anno 1988 picking pieces of glass out of his foot…
… this is John McClane almost 20 years later, saving the country without getting all the shit kicked out of him, and be honest, what do we care the most about? McClane saving the day or McClane saving the day looking like he's been fighting a fucking army?
You also can't help thinking about a couple of things during the movie, like why none of the FBI agents thought about going to the power plant in West Virginia, why a parking lot leads directly into a power plant's main control room, how McClane knew where Gabriel was going in the end even though he was busy fighting a fighter aircraft, why Gabriel was using a van with a GPS that the government had access to and if Timothy Olyphant will be less annoying with no hair and a bar code in the neck. I doubt it.
Live Free or Die Hard isn't a Die Hard movie; it's an over-the-top action flick with a lot of CGI, and John McClane just so happens to be in it. Not a bad movie, but definitely not worthy of a place in the Die Hard series.
6/10.
[poll=5]
12 comments
Oh oh Marcus, ye did it again! (2 posts)
by Code on 27th Jun at 22:16. #
Oh noes. Fixed.
by Marcus on 27th Jun at 23:41. #
Well yeah, been talking to you on MSN but I agree with most of what you are saying.
by Kasper on 27th Jun at 23:59. #
I liked it.
It’s not the same kind of movie as the first one. But if you look at how the series evolved through 1,2,3 you’ll see that 4 is a natural progression. With every movie it’s moved more and more towards over the top action.
You might not like that, and that’s fine. But what I got was 2 hours of John McClane kicking ass. Some pretty cool one liners and two awesome ones, and just a great old fashioned action movie. Of course I have some problems with it, there’s only like 3-4 movies I don’t have a problem with.
Overall, a lot of very cool action, I was only bored for one minute during the car + helicopter chase.
And dude, he had lots of blood and cuts on him. And he had a limp.
by polt on 28th Jun at 0:43. #
“Live Free or Die Hard isn’t a Die Hard movie; it’s an over-the-top action flick with a lot of CGI, and John McClane just so happens to be in it.”
You see? This was my fear!
It sounds like we don’t see so much John McClane as character, atleast not so much as we hoped for.(?)
- But I must agree with Lopt, with how the series evolved through 1,2 and part 3.
Though, I’m still looking forward to see the movie tonight!
by 12vGuru on 28th Jun at 12:16. #
> polt
I disagree that it’s the natural progession. All the previous movies had over-the-top action (ie. the exploding skyscraper with McClane jumping with the hose, the bad guys pelting McClane with grenades making him eject the pilot seat, a subway train going off it’s track in a crowded station, etc.), but it all seemed more believable, and hence, more fun. They made similar, crazy action scenes in this movie, they just seem too unrealistic to me, seems like they chose to do it this way to top everything else in the previous movies, instead of just keeping it cool and believable.
He may have been injured in the end, from sliding down the asphalt, getting shot etc., but I wanted him to get properly beat up. Did he have a limp? How did get get that?
> 12vGuru
I was actually satisified with how McClane was portrayed, his behaviour was easily recognizable from the previous movies so they nailed that part in my opinion.
by Marcus on 28th Jun at 14:05. #
I don’t know if it would have been as cool if all the action was believable. I mean, we’ve already seen those movie. If it had been those two guys running around in a somewhat believable action movie, it would have been Die Hard Mega Hard.
by polt on 28th Jun at 17:42. #
The whole plot of the movie is also full of holes. The story is way too unrealistic and same goes for the action. E.g. the fight scene between Mai and McClane was pretty cool to start off with (so were the line where McClane said something like “stupid kung fu shit”) but it just lasted too damn long and that chick just kept on fighting even after she got run down by a damn SUV.
by Kasper on 28th Jun at 21:56. #
Yeah, even though the scene with the SUV in the elevator shaft was pretty cool, it was pretty weird that she could just keep on fighting after being hit with the car like that.
by polt on 28th Jun at 22:29. #
Just returned from the theater. – Damn, that movie was awesome. McClane had a lot of cool punch-lines, so had the kid.
Yeah, the movie has some story-holes, it wasn’t realistic at all, but still McClane made it all worth it.
If I had a fancy website as Marcus, I would rate it: 8/10. !
by 12vGuru on 28th Jun at 22:31. #
> polt
Well, in my opinion the movie would’ve been A LOT better, if they had replaced the aircraft-scene with a proper fire- and meleefight-scene, in which McClane would get kicked around but, naturally, come out on top, and change the bad guy, McClane doesn’t save the entire country (= probably world, if the US collapsed), again, it’s too much over-the-top, let him save a city and some hostages, it’s worked fine before.
by Marcus on 29th Jun at 8:25. #
Yeah, the thing with the jet wasn’t good.
by polt on 29th Jun at 19:15. #